Motorola LS6000B-U Guía de usuario Pagina 130

  • Descarga
  • Añadir a mis manuales
  • Imprimir
  • Pagina
    / 180
  • Tabla de contenidos
  • MARCADORES
  • Valorado. / 5. Basado en revisión del cliente
Vista de pagina 129
LS 6000 Scintillation System User’s Manual
PN 247971-F
7-4
How Sample Preparation Affects Results
Counting Filters And Precipitates
This phase problem can often be eliminated by using less sample, more cocktail, or switching
to a cocktail with better sample holding characteristics. Sometimes diluting the sample with
water or neutralizing the pH will work.
If you are not sure whether your sample is separating into two phases, a simple test can be
done. Prepare a glass vial of the cocktail and sample you use for the experiment. Observe the
sample over the time and temperature range it is exposed to during counting. If the sample
stays single phase, there is no problem. If it becomes
two phase, try some of the procedures
outlined above on fresh preparations. The 2 Phase Monitor (if installed) flags any samples
detected as two phase.
7.4 Counting Filters And Precipitates
Any sample that is not intimately mixed with the cocktail will count with a low efficiency and
with unpredictable and varying results. Quench monitors are not accurate, DPM are difficult
to calculate, and even comparisons of CPM between samples may give misleading results.
Counting precipitates on filters or as pellets from centrifugation is a very common procedure.
It can be used effectively if certain precautions are taken. There are two main problems in
getting accurate and reproducible results from filters or precipitates. First, the amount of
physical precipitate will affect the CPM recorded. More sample material will absorb more of
the radio-active decay events. This beta absorption results in decreased CPM with increasing
amount of precipitate. The second problem results from the precipitate dissolving in the
cocktail over a period of time. This results in variability between repeat counts and between
different samples.
There are two ways to avoid these problems. The less desirable method is to have samples
with approximately the same amount of precipitate and to select a cocktail in which the
precipitate will not dissolve. While DPM cannot be calculated for these samples, at least the
CPM between samples can be compared.
The other, and better, method is to dissolve the sample completely before counting. In the
case of proteins or nucleic acid precipitates, this is a very simple procedure. Add enough 0.05
to 0.1 M KQH (100 µL is a good starting volume) to wet the filter or dissolve the pellet. After
mixing, add a cocktail such as Beckman Ready-Solv HP. This will emulsify the KOH along
with the sample. It is not necessary for the filter to dissolve. This
type of preparation is not
affected by the amount of precipitate, and DPM calculations are easily done in the usual
manner.
7.5 Distinguishing Sample And Instrument Variability
Introduction
The sample preparation problems discussed in this chapter can lead to counts that are too
high, too low, that increase with time, decrease with time, or go up and down in a random
pattern. This is often mistaken for instrument malfunction. However, there are instrument
problems that can cause similar symptoms. This section outlines how sample problems and
instrument problems can be distinguished. These tests are not 100% conclusive but they do
form good grounds for you to analyze the most common problems encountered and to
communicate valuable information to the service representative.
Vista de pagina 129
1 2 ... 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 ... 179 180

Comentarios a estos manuales

Sin comentarios